Eswatini vs Zimbabwe: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF
Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF over time
- Eswatini
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports -4.4% against -6.3% in Eswatini, a difference of 1.9%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 160th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 203 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -5.1% | -14.1% | 9.0% | Eswatini |
| 2000s | -8.3% | -15.4% | 7.1% | Eswatini |
| 2010s | -0.7% | -9.8% | 9.1% | Eswatini |
| 2020s | -1.8% | -8.8% | 7.0% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf, Eswatini or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at -4.4% against -6.3% in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf between Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
- 1.9%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Zimbabwe rank globally for nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf?
- Eswatini ranks 160th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF.. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5). Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.