Euro area vs Maldives: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF
Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF over time
- Euro area
- Maldives
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 529.2% against -37.0% in Euro area, a difference of 566.2%.
That makes Maldives's figure about 14.3 times Euro area's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Euro area ahead.
Euro area ranks 2nd and Maldives ranks 5th of 2 groups.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Euro area | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -4.7% | 61.2% | 65.9% | Maldives |
| 2000s | -20.9% | 217.8% | 238.8% | Maldives |
| 2010s | -28.1% | 471.5% | 499.6% | Maldives |
| 2020s | -34.2% | 472.0% | 506.2% | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf, Euro area or Maldives?
- Maldives, at 529.2% against -37.0% in Euro area as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf between Euro area and Maldives?
- 566.2%, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Maldives?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Euro area and Maldives rank globally for nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf?
- Euro area ranks 2nd and Maldives ranks 5th of 2 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF.. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5). Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.