Lithuania vs Zimbabwe: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF
Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF over time
- Lithuania
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports -4.1% against -4.4% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 155th and Zimbabwe ranks 158th of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -17.1% | -14.1% | 3.0% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | -5.2% | -15.4% | 10.2% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 17.8% | -9.8% | 27.6% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 5.2% | -8.8% | 14.0% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf, Lithuania or Zimbabwe?
- Lithuania, at -4.1% against -4.4% in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf between Lithuania and Zimbabwe?
- 0.3%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Zimbabwe?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Zimbabwe rank globally for nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf?
- Lithuania ranks 155th and Zimbabwe ranks 158th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF.. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5). Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.