Antigua and Barbuda vs Cook Islands: NPK fertilizers — Agricultural Use
NPK fertilizers — Agricultural Use over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Cook Islands
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 13 t against 5 t in Cook Islands, a difference of 8 t.
That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 2.6 times Cook Islands's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Cook Islands has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 113th and Cook Islands ranks 116th of 122 countries.
Cook Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Cook Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.33 t | 112.33 t | 69 t | Cook Islands |
| 2010s | 19 t | 38 t | 19 t | Cook Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — agricultural use, Antigua and Barbuda or Cook Islands?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 13 t against 5 t in Cook Islands as of 2011.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — agricultural use between Antigua and Barbuda and Cook Islands?
- 8 t, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Cook Islands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2011.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Cook Islands rank globally for npk fertilizers — agricultural use?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 113th and Cook Islands ranks 116th of 122 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf