Antigua and Barbuda vs Rwanda: NPK fertilizers β Agricultural Use
NPK fertilizers β Agricultural Use over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Rwanda
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 13 t against 5 t in Rwanda, a difference of 8 t.
That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 2.6 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Rwanda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 113th and Rwanda ranks 116th of 121 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.25 t | 6,523 t | 6,489 t | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 13 t | 5 t | 8 t | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers β agricultural use, Antigua and Barbuda or Rwanda?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 13 t against 5 t in Rwanda as of 2011.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers β agricultural use between Antigua and Barbuda and Rwanda?
- 8 t, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Rwanda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2011.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Rwanda rank globally for npk fertilizers β agricultural use?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 113th and Rwanda ranks 116th of 121 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers β Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf