Argentina vs Zimbabwe: NPK fertilizers — Agricultural Use
NPK fertilizers — Agricultural Use over time
- Argentina
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 133,698 t against 108,246 t in Argentina, a difference of 25,452 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Argentina ranks 31st and Zimbabwe ranks 28th of 130 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,573 t | 49,273 t | 42,700 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 78,121 t | 6,648 t | 71,474 t | Argentina |
| 2020s | 113,365 t | 147,807 t | 34,442 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — agricultural use, Argentina or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 133,698 t against 108,246 t in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — agricultural use between Argentina and Zimbabwe?
- 25,452 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Zimbabwe?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Zimbabwe rank globally for npk fertilizers — agricultural use?
- Argentina ranks 31st and Zimbabwe ranks 28th of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf