Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Slovakia: NPK fertilizers — Agricultural Use
NPK fertilizers — Agricultural Use over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 59,315 t against 59,086 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 229 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 38th and Slovakia ranks 37th of 122 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28,873 t | 4,390 t | 24,483 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 61,436 t | 2,481 t | 58,955 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — agricultural use, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 59,315 t against 59,086 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — agricultural use between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Slovakia?
- 229 t, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Slovakia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2011.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Slovakia rank globally for npk fertilizers — agricultural use?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 38th and Slovakia ranks 37th of 122 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf