Dominican Republic vs Iceland: NPK fertilizers — Agricultural Use
NPK fertilizers — Agricultural Use over time
- Dominican Republic
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 20,080 t against 15,455 t in Dominican Republic, a difference of 4,625 t.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.3 times Dominican Republic's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 61st and Iceland ranks 58th of 122 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,588 t | 23,203 t | 14,615 t | Iceland |
| 2010s | 10,363 t | 32,154 t | 21,791 t | Iceland |
| 2020s | 15,648 t | 35,856 t | 20,208 t | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — agricultural use, Dominican Republic or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 20,080 t against 15,455 t in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — agricultural use between Dominican Republic and Iceland?
- 4,625 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Iceland?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Iceland rank globally for npk fertilizers — agricultural use?
- Dominican Republic ranks 61st and Iceland ranks 58th of 122 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf