Malawi vs Mexico: NPK fertilizers — Agricultural Use

Malawi
109,685 t
in 2016
Mexico
106,893 t
in 2011
Malawi rank
30th
Mexico rank
32nd

NPK fertilizers — Agricultural Use over time

  • Malawi
  • Mexico
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k200220092016

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 109,685 t against 106,893 t in Mexico, a difference of 2,792 t.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 30th and Mexico ranks 32nd of 130 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Mexico Difference Ahead
2000s 54,224 t 172,749 t 118,525 t Mexico
2010s 60,906 t 140,896 t 79,989 t Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher npk fertilizers — agricultural use, Malawi or Mexico?
Malawi, at 109,685 t against 106,893 t in Mexico as of 2016.
What is the difference in npk fertilizers — agricultural use between Malawi and Mexico?
2,792 t, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Mexico?
7 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
How do Malawi and Mexico rank globally for npk fertilizers — agricultural use?
Malawi ranks 30th and Mexico ranks 32nd of 130 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
NPK fertilizers — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
131 places, 1,535 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf