Mozambique vs Papua New Guinea: NPK fertilizers — Agricultural Use
NPK fertilizers — Agricultural Use over time
- Mozambique
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 5,688 t against 5,216 t in Mozambique, a difference of 472 t.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Mozambique ahead.
Mozambique ranks 78th and Papua New Guinea ranks 77th of 122 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19,038 t | 3,246 t | 15,792 t | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 2,897 t | 6,524 t | 3,628 t | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — agricultural use, Mozambique or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 5,688 t against 5,216 t in Mozambique as of 2011.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — agricultural use between Mozambique and Papua New Guinea?
- 472 t, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Papua New Guinea?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2011.
- How do Mozambique and Papua New Guinea rank globally for npk fertilizers — agricultural use?
- Mozambique ranks 78th and Papua New Guinea ranks 77th of 122 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf