Republic of Moldova vs Türkiye: NPK fertilizers — Agricultural Use
NPK fertilizers — Agricultural Use over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Türkiye
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports 265,090 t against 41,522 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 223,568 t.
That makes Türkiye's figure about 6.4 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Türkiye has been ahead every year.
Republic of Moldova ranks 3rd and Türkiye ranks 2nd of 7 countries.
Türkiye has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9,646 t | 283,217 t | 273,571 t | Türkiye |
| 2010s | 32,174 t | 245,595 t | 213,421 t | Türkiye |
| 2020s | 54,669 t | 316,408 t | 261,740 t | Türkiye |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — agricultural use, Republic of Moldova or Türkiye?
- Türkiye, at 265,090 t against 41,522 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — agricultural use between Republic of Moldova and Türkiye?
- 223,568 t, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Türkiye?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2021.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Türkiye rank globally for npk fertilizers — agricultural use?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 3rd and Türkiye ranks 2nd of 7 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf