Samoa vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: NPK fertilizers β Agricultural Use
NPK fertilizers β Agricultural Use over time
- Samoa
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 34 t against 28 t in Samoa, a difference of 6 t.
That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.2 times Samoa's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Samoa ranks 112th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 111th of 121 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 73 t | 131.83 t | 58.83 t | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 42.67 t | 144.67 t | 102 t | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers β agricultural use, Samoa or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 34 t against 28 t in Samoa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers β agricultural use between Samoa and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 6 t, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Samoa and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for npk fertilizers β agricultural use?
- Samoa ranks 112th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 111th of 121 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers β Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf