Botswana vs North Macedonia: NPK fertilizers — Export quantity
NPK fertilizers — Export quantity over time
- Botswana
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 319.09 t against 211 t in Botswana, a difference of 108.09 t.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.5 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 88th and North Macedonia ranks 86th of 123 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72 t | 6.67 t | 65.33 t | Botswana |
| 2010s | 0.5875 t | 163.3 t | 162.71 t | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 250 t | 213.24 t | 36.76 t | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — export quantity, Botswana or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 319.09 t against 211 t in Botswana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — export quantity between Botswana and North Macedonia?
- 108.09 t, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and North Macedonia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and North Macedonia rank globally for npk fertilizers — export quantity?
- Botswana ranks 88th and North Macedonia ranks 86th of 123 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf