Chile vs El Salvador: NPK fertilizers — Export value
NPK fertilizers — Export value over time
- Chile
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 7,619 1000 USD against 6,386 1000 USD in Chile, a difference of 1,233 1000 USD.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 53rd and El Salvador ranks 50th of 123 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and El Salvador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9,225 1000 USD | 6,279 1000 USD | 2,946 1000 USD | Chile |
| 2010s | 6,224 1000 USD | 13,171 1000 USD | 6,947 1000 USD | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 16,383 1000 USD | 11,018 1000 USD | 5,364 1000 USD | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — export value, Chile or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 7,619 1000 USD against 6,386 1000 USD in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — export value between Chile and El Salvador?
- 1,233 1000 USD, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and El Salvador?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Chile and El Salvador rank globally for npk fertilizers — export value?
- Chile ranks 53rd and El Salvador ranks 50th of 123 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf