Ecuador vs Indonesia: NPK fertilizers — Export value
NPK fertilizers — Export value over time
- Ecuador
- Indonesia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 2,488 1000 USD against 1,899 1000 USD in Indonesia, a difference of 589 1000 USD.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times Indonesia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 68th and Indonesia ranks 71st of 123 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Indonesia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 171.61 1000 USD | 3,221 1000 USD | 3,049 1000 USD | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 927.39 1000 USD | 16,303 1000 USD | 15,376 1000 USD | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 2,693 1000 USD | 2,453 1000 USD | 240.25 1000 USD | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — export value, Ecuador or Indonesia?
- Ecuador, at 2,488 1000 USD against 1,899 1000 USD in Indonesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — export value between Ecuador and Indonesia?
- 589 1000 USD, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Indonesia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Indonesia rank globally for npk fertilizers — export value?
- Ecuador ranks 68th and Indonesia ranks 71st of 123 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf