Ecuador vs Luxembourg: NPK fertilizers — Export value
NPK fertilizers — Export value over time
- Ecuador
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 2,590 1000 USD against 2,488 1000 USD in Ecuador, a difference of 102 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Ecuador ranks 68th and Luxembourg ranks 67th of 123 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 171.61 1000 USD | 2,066 1000 USD | 1,895 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 927.39 1000 USD | 2,610 1000 USD | 1,682 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 2,693 1000 USD | 2,155 1000 USD | 538.21 1000 USD | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — export value, Ecuador or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 2,590 1000 USD against 2,488 1000 USD in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — export value between Ecuador and Luxembourg?
- 102 1000 USD, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Luxembourg?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Luxembourg rank globally for npk fertilizers — export value?
- Ecuador ranks 68th and Luxembourg ranks 67th of 123 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf