Eswatini vs Sri Lanka: NPK fertilizers — Export value
NPK fertilizers — Export value over time
- Eswatini
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 4.8 1000 USD against 1.66 1000 USD in Eswatini, a difference of 3.14 1000 USD.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 2.9 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Eswatini ranks 120th and Sri Lanka ranks 118th of 123 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.96 1000 USD | 4.21 1000 USD | 85.75 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 8.69 1000 USD | 41.91 1000 USD | 33.22 1000 USD | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 2.33 1000 USD | 11.32 1000 USD | 8.99 1000 USD | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — export value, Eswatini or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 4.8 1000 USD against 1.66 1000 USD in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — export value between Eswatini and Sri Lanka?
- 3.14 1000 USD, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sri Lanka?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Sri Lanka rank globally for npk fertilizers — export value?
- Eswatini ranks 120th and Sri Lanka ranks 118th of 123 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf