Lebanon vs Mozambique: NPK fertilizers — Export value
NPK fertilizers — Export value over time
- Lebanon
- Mozambique
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 240.59 1000 USD against 224.19 1000 USD in Mozambique, a difference of 16.4 1000 USD.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 82nd and Mozambique ranks 83rd of 114 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 394.73 1000 USD | 583.99 1000 USD | 189.26 1000 USD | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 48.64 1000 USD | 1,828 1000 USD | 1,779 1000 USD | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 133.03 1000 USD | 6,196 1000 USD | 6,063 1000 USD | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — export value, Lebanon or Mozambique?
- Lebanon, at 240.59 1000 USD against 224.19 1000 USD in Mozambique as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — export value between Lebanon and Mozambique?
- 16.4 1000 USD, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Mozambique?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Lebanon and Mozambique rank globally for npk fertilizers — export value?
- Lebanon ranks 82nd and Mozambique ranks 83rd of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf