Lithuania vs Serbia: NPK fertilizers — Export value
NPK fertilizers — Export value over time
- Lithuania
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 122,162 1000 USD against 86,975 1000 USD in Lithuania, a difference of 35,187 1000 USD.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.4 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 16th and Serbia ranks 13th of 123 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80,390 1000 USD | 15,967 1000 USD | 64,423 1000 USD | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 80,564 1000 USD | 33,255 1000 USD | 47,308 1000 USD | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 150,036 1000 USD | 110,986 1000 USD | 39,051 1000 USD | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — export value, Lithuania or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 122,162 1000 USD against 86,975 1000 USD in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — export value between Lithuania and Serbia?
- 35,187 1000 USD, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Serbia rank globally for npk fertilizers — export value?
- Lithuania ranks 16th and Serbia ranks 13th of 123 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf