Burkina Faso vs Slovenia: NPK fertilizers — Import quantity
NPK fertilizers — Import quantity over time
- Burkina Faso
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 174,243 t against 153,899 t in Burkina Faso, a difference of 20,344 t.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 30th and Slovenia ranks 27th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72,192 t | 74,338 t | 2,146 t | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 111,582 t | 61,562 t | 50,020 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 154,884 t | 112,077 t | 42,806 t | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import quantity, Burkina Faso or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 174,243 t against 153,899 t in Burkina Faso as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import quantity between Burkina Faso and Slovenia?
- 20,344 t, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Slovenia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and Slovenia rank globally for npk fertilizers — import quantity?
- Burkina Faso ranks 30th and Slovenia ranks 27th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf