Chile vs North Macedonia: NPK fertilizers — Import quantity
NPK fertilizers — Import quantity over time
- Chile
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 26,829 t against 25,459 t in Chile, a difference of 1,370 t.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Chile ranks 72nd and North Macedonia ranks 71st of 187 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,673 t | 20,525 t | 11,852 t | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 11,789 t | 23,080 t | 11,291 t | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 17,674 t | 19,521 t | 1,848 t | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import quantity, Chile or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 26,829 t against 25,459 t in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import quantity between Chile and North Macedonia?
- 1,370 t, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and North Macedonia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Chile and North Macedonia rank globally for npk fertilizers — import quantity?
- Chile ranks 72nd and North Macedonia ranks 71st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf