Equatorial Guinea vs Tuvalu: NPK fertilizers — Import quantity
NPK fertilizers — Import quantity over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 32 t against 23 t in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 9 t.
That makes Tuvalu's figure about 1.4 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 176th and Tuvalu ranks 173rd of 187 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 83.79 t | 9.87 t | 73.93 t | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 53.11 t | 23 t | 30.11 t | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import quantity, Equatorial Guinea or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 32 t against 23 t in Equatorial Guinea as of 2021.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import quantity between Equatorial Guinea and Tuvalu?
- 9 t, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Tuvalu?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Tuvalu rank globally for npk fertilizers — import quantity?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 176th and Tuvalu ranks 173rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf