Luxembourg vs Pakistan: NPK fertilizers — Import quantity
NPK fertilizers — Import quantity over time
- Luxembourg
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 9,163 t against 7,713 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 1,450 t.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.2 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 119th and Pakistan ranks 117th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16,917 t | 2,558 t | 14,358 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 10,662 t | 4,004 t | 6,658 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 5,987 t | 9,494 t | 3,508 t | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import quantity, Luxembourg or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 9,163 t against 7,713 t in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import quantity between Luxembourg and Pakistan?
- 1,450 t, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Pakistan?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Pakistan rank globally for npk fertilizers — import quantity?
- Luxembourg ranks 119th and Pakistan ranks 117th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf