Angola vs Costa Rica: NPK fertilizers — Import value
NPK fertilizers — Import value over time
- Angola
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 35,149 1000 USD against 31,307 1000 USD in Angola, a difference of 3,842 1000 USD.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Angola ranks 57th and Costa Rica ranks 54th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Costa Rica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,943 1000 USD | 9,956 1000 USD | 1,013 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 26,081 1000 USD | 12,083 1000 USD | 13,998 1000 USD | Angola |
| 2020s | 26,883 1000 USD | 20,767 1000 USD | 6,116 1000 USD | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import value, Angola or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 35,149 1000 USD against 31,307 1000 USD in Angola as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import value between Angola and Costa Rica?
- 3,842 1000 USD, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Costa Rica?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Costa Rica rank globally for npk fertilizers — import value?
- Angola ranks 57th and Costa Rica ranks 54th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf