Armenia vs Uzbekistan: NPK fertilizers — Import value
NPK fertilizers — Import value over time
- Armenia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 4,110 1000 USD against 3,476 1000 USD in Armenia, a difference of 634 1000 USD.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.2 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Armenia ranks 132nd and Uzbekistan ranks 129th of 201 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.67 1000 USD | 364.42 1000 USD | 274.75 1000 USD | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 880.05 1000 USD | 1,551 1000 USD | 670.98 1000 USD | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 2,576 1000 USD | 4,086 1000 USD | 1,510 1000 USD | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import value, Armenia or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 4,110 1000 USD against 3,476 1000 USD in Armenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import value between Armenia and Uzbekistan?
- 634 1000 USD, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Uzbekistan?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Uzbekistan rank globally for npk fertilizers — import value?
- Armenia ranks 132nd and Uzbekistan ranks 129th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf