Azerbaijan vs Belarus: NPK fertilizers — Import value
NPK fertilizers — Import value over time
- Azerbaijan
- Belarus
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 12,208 1000 USD against 11,383 1000 USD in Belarus, a difference of 825 1000 USD.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 92nd and Belarus ranks 94th of 201 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,201 1000 USD | 618.92 1000 USD | 582 1000 USD | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 8,274 1000 USD | 1,501 1000 USD | 6,772 1000 USD | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 13,791 1000 USD | 5,212 1000 USD | 8,579 1000 USD | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import value, Azerbaijan or Belarus?
- Azerbaijan, at 12,208 1000 USD against 11,383 1000 USD in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import value between Azerbaijan and Belarus?
- 825 1000 USD, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Belarus?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Azerbaijan and Belarus rank globally for npk fertilizers — import value?
- Azerbaijan ranks 92nd and Belarus ranks 94th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf