Azerbaijan vs Gambia: NPK fertilizers — Import value
NPK fertilizers — Import value over time
- Azerbaijan
- Gambia
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 13,194 1000 USD against 12,208 1000 USD in Azerbaijan, a difference of 986 1000 USD.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 92nd and Gambia ranks 90th of 201 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,201 1000 USD | 5.94 1000 USD | 1,195 1000 USD | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 8,427 1000 USD | 540.26 1000 USD | 7,887 1000 USD | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 13,791 1000 USD | 12,697 1000 USD | 1,094 1000 USD | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import value, Azerbaijan or Gambia?
- Gambia, at 13,194 1000 USD against 12,208 1000 USD in Azerbaijan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import value between Azerbaijan and Gambia?
- 986 1000 USD, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Gambia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Azerbaijan and Gambia rank globally for npk fertilizers — import value?
- Azerbaijan ranks 92nd and Gambia ranks 90th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf