Bahamas vs Jamaica: NPK fertilizers — Import value
NPK fertilizers — Import value over time
- Bahamas
- Jamaica
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 1,572 1000 USD against 1,230 1000 USD in Bahamas, a difference of 342 1000 USD.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.3 times Bahamas's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Bahamas ahead.
Bahamas ranks 147th and Jamaica ranks 145th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Jamaica in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 691.14 1000 USD | 518.14 1000 USD | 173 1000 USD | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 1,099 1000 USD | 1,371 1000 USD | 272.47 1000 USD | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 1,015 1000 USD | 1,406 1000 USD | 390.89 1000 USD | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import value, Bahamas or Jamaica?
- Jamaica, at 1,572 1000 USD against 1,230 1000 USD in Bahamas as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import value between Bahamas and Jamaica?
- 342 1000 USD, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Jamaica?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Bahamas and Jamaica rank globally for npk fertilizers — import value?
- Bahamas ranks 147th and Jamaica ranks 145th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf