Belgium vs Croatia: NPK fertilizers — Import value
NPK fertilizers — Import value over time
- Belgium
- Croatia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 61,230 1000 USD against 55,986 1000 USD in Croatia, a difference of 5,244 1000 USD.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 40th and Croatia ranks 41st of 201 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55,233 1000 USD | 8,578 1000 USD | 46,655 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2010s | 66,909 1000 USD | 14,353 1000 USD | 52,556 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2020s | 66,710 1000 USD | 54,477 1000 USD | 12,233 1000 USD | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import value, Belgium or Croatia?
- Belgium, at 61,230 1000 USD against 55,986 1000 USD in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import value between Belgium and Croatia?
- 5,244 1000 USD, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Croatia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Croatia rank globally for npk fertilizers — import value?
- Belgium ranks 40th and Croatia ranks 41st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf