Chile vs Iceland: NPK fertilizers — Import value
NPK fertilizers — Import value over time
- Chile
- Iceland
How they compare
Chile currently reports 19,604 1000 USD against 17,665 1000 USD in Iceland, a difference of 1,939 1000 USD.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Iceland ahead.
Chile ranks 73rd and Iceland ranks 76th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,251 1000 USD | 11,165 1000 USD | 3,914 1000 USD | Iceland |
| 2010s | 11,180 1000 USD | 15,392 1000 USD | 4,212 1000 USD | Iceland |
| 2020s | 18,547 1000 USD | 17,682 1000 USD | 865.04 1000 USD | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import value, Chile or Iceland?
- Chile, at 19,604 1000 USD against 17,665 1000 USD in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import value between Chile and Iceland?
- 1,939 1000 USD, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Iceland?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Iceland rank globally for npk fertilizers — import value?
- Chile ranks 73rd and Iceland ranks 76th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf