Comoros vs Guinea-Bissau: NPK fertilizers — Import value
NPK fertilizers — Import value over time
- Comoros
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 322.88 1000 USD against 318.38 1000 USD in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 4.5 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 165th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 166th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 1 and Guinea-Bissau in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.42 1000 USD | 31.85 1000 USD | 7.42 1000 USD | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 14.74 1000 USD | 99.74 1000 USD | 84.99 1000 USD | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 363.01 1000 USD | 263.54 1000 USD | 99.47 1000 USD | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import value, Comoros or Guinea-Bissau?
- Comoros, at 322.88 1000 USD against 318.38 1000 USD in Guinea-Bissau as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import value between Comoros and Guinea-Bissau?
- 4.5 1000 USD, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Guinea-Bissau?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Comoros and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for npk fertilizers — import value?
- Comoros ranks 165th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 166th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf