Congo vs Mauritius: NPK fertilizers — Import value
NPK fertilizers — Import value over time
- Congo
- Mauritius
How they compare
Congo currently reports 3,554 1000 USD against 3,308 1000 USD in Mauritius, a difference of 246 1000 USD.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 131st and Mauritius ranks 134th of 201 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 828.42 1000 USD | 1,649 1000 USD | 820.51 1000 USD | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 582.61 1000 USD | 2,343 1000 USD | 1,761 1000 USD | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 2,404 1000 USD | 5,162 1000 USD | 2,757 1000 USD | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import value, Congo or Mauritius?
- Congo, at 3,554 1000 USD against 3,308 1000 USD in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import value between Congo and Mauritius?
- 246 1000 USD, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mauritius?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Mauritius rank globally for npk fertilizers — import value?
- Congo ranks 131st and Mauritius ranks 134th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf