Cuba vs Zimbabwe: NPK fertilizers — Import value
NPK fertilizers — Import value over time
- Cuba
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 5,683 1000 USD against 5,445 1000 USD in Zimbabwe, a difference of 238 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 122nd and Zimbabwe ranks 123rd of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11,442 1000 USD | 10,150 1000 USD | 1,292 1000 USD | Cuba |
| 2010s | 17,916 1000 USD | 5,106 1000 USD | 12,810 1000 USD | Cuba |
| 2020s | 7,607 1000 USD | 11,346 1000 USD | 3,739 1000 USD | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import value, Cuba or Zimbabwe?
- Cuba, at 5,683 1000 USD against 5,445 1000 USD in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import value between Cuba and Zimbabwe?
- 238 1000 USD, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for npk fertilizers — import value?
- Cuba ranks 122nd and Zimbabwe ranks 123rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf