Eswatini vs Guyana: NPK fertilizers — Import value
NPK fertilizers — Import value over time
- Eswatini
- Guyana
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 10,310 1000 USD against 9,799 1000 USD in Eswatini, a difference of 511 1000 USD.
That makes Guyana's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 103rd and Guyana ranks 101st of 201 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,540 1000 USD | 187.37 1000 USD | 5,353 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 4,813 1000 USD | 1,041 1000 USD | 3,772 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 8,418 1000 USD | 4,734 1000 USD | 3,684 1000 USD | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import value, Eswatini or Guyana?
- Guyana, at 10,310 1000 USD against 9,799 1000 USD in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import value between Eswatini and Guyana?
- 511 1000 USD, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guyana?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Guyana rank globally for npk fertilizers — import value?
- Eswatini ranks 103rd and Guyana ranks 101st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf