Kyrgyzstan vs Saudi Arabia: NPK fertilizers — Import value
NPK fertilizers — Import value over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 4,769 1000 USD against 4,551 1000 USD in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 218 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 115th and Saudi Arabia ranks 114th of 185 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.31 1000 USD | 3,413 1000 USD | 3,332 1000 USD | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 1,332 1000 USD | 10,933 1000 USD | 9,601 1000 USD | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 5,799 1000 USD | 5,833 1000 USD | 33.1 1000 USD | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import value, Kyrgyzstan or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 4,769 1000 USD against 4,551 1000 USD in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import value between Kyrgyzstan and Saudi Arabia?
- 218 1000 USD, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Saudi Arabia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Saudi Arabia rank globally for npk fertilizers — import value?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 115th and Saudi Arabia ranks 114th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf