Kyrgyzstan vs Zimbabwe: NPK fertilizers — Import value
NPK fertilizers — Import value over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 5,445 1000 USD against 4,551 1000 USD in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 894 1000 USD.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 112th of 187 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.31 1000 USD | 10,950 1000 USD | 10,869 1000 USD | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 1,332 1000 USD | 5,106 1000 USD | 3,774 1000 USD | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 6,111 1000 USD | 11,346 1000 USD | 5,234 1000 USD | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import value, Kyrgyzstan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 5,445 1000 USD against 4,551 1000 USD in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import value between Kyrgyzstan and Zimbabwe?
- 894 1000 USD, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Zimbabwe?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Zimbabwe rank globally for npk fertilizers — import value?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 112th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf