Liberia vs Singapore: NPK fertilizers — Import value
NPK fertilizers — Import value over time
- Liberia
- Singapore
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 2,205 1000 USD against 1,743 1000 USD in Singapore, a difference of 462 1000 USD.
That makes Liberia's figure about 1.3 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Singapore ahead.
Liberia ranks 141st and Singapore ranks 143rd of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.07 1000 USD | 1,982 1000 USD | 1,888 1000 USD | Singapore |
| 2010s | 2,558 1000 USD | 2,260 1000 USD | 298.01 1000 USD | Liberia |
| 2020s | 2,100 1000 USD | 3,171 1000 USD | 1,071 1000 USD | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import value, Liberia or Singapore?
- Liberia, at 2,205 1000 USD against 1,743 1000 USD in Singapore as of 2023.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import value between Liberia and Singapore?
- 462 1000 USD, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Singapore?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Liberia and Singapore rank globally for npk fertilizers — import value?
- Liberia ranks 141st and Singapore ranks 143rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf