Libya vs Sri Lanka: NPK fertilizers — Import value
NPK fertilizers — Import value over time
- Libya
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 7,584 1000 USD against 7,014 1000 USD in Libya, a difference of 570 1000 USD.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 118th and Sri Lanka ranks 116th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,961 1000 USD | 5,970 1000 USD | 4,009 1000 USD | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 4,562 1000 USD | 4,114 1000 USD | 448.3 1000 USD | Libya |
| 2020s | 8,819 1000 USD | 8,810 1000 USD | 8.67 1000 USD | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import value, Libya or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 7,584 1000 USD against 7,014 1000 USD in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import value between Libya and Sri Lanka?
- 570 1000 USD, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Sri Lanka?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Sri Lanka rank globally for npk fertilizers — import value?
- Libya ranks 118th and Sri Lanka ranks 116th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf