Lithuania vs Romania: NPK fertilizers — Import value
NPK fertilizers — Import value over time
- Lithuania
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 134,784 1000 USD against 113,583 1000 USD in Lithuania, a difference of 21,201 1000 USD.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.2 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 16th and Romania ranks 13th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37,741 1000 USD | 17,637 1000 USD | 20,103 1000 USD | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 150,566 1000 USD | 53,453 1000 USD | 97,112 1000 USD | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 166,386 1000 USD | 178,785 1000 USD | 12,399 1000 USD | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import value, Lithuania or Romania?
- Romania, at 134,784 1000 USD against 113,583 1000 USD in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import value between Lithuania and Romania?
- 21,201 1000 USD, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Romania?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Romania rank globally for npk fertilizers — import value?
- Lithuania ranks 16th and Romania ranks 13th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf