Luxembourg vs Suriname: NPK fertilizers — Import value
NPK fertilizers — Import value over time
- Luxembourg
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 3,303 1000 USD against 3,276 1000 USD in Luxembourg, a difference of 27 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 136th and Suriname ranks 135th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,524 1000 USD | 1,802 1000 USD | 3,722 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 4,060 1000 USD | 4,237 1000 USD | 177.14 1000 USD | Suriname |
| 2020s | 2,660 1000 USD | 2,868 1000 USD | 207.78 1000 USD | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import value, Luxembourg or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 3,303 1000 USD against 3,276 1000 USD in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import value between Luxembourg and Suriname?
- 27 1000 USD, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Suriname?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Suriname rank globally for npk fertilizers — import value?
- Luxembourg ranks 136th and Suriname ranks 135th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf