Madagascar vs Tunisia: NPK fertilizers — Import value
NPK fertilizers — Import value over time
- Madagascar
- Tunisia
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 13,462 1000 USD against 12,632 1000 USD in Tunisia, a difference of 830 1000 USD.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Madagascar ahead.
Madagascar ranks 89th and Tunisia ranks 91st of 201 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,818 1000 USD | 2,956 1000 USD | 2,862 1000 USD | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 8,410 1000 USD | 6,557 1000 USD | 1,853 1000 USD | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 13,858 1000 USD | 9,594 1000 USD | 4,264 1000 USD | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import value, Madagascar or Tunisia?
- Madagascar, at 13,462 1000 USD against 12,632 1000 USD in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import value between Madagascar and Tunisia?
- 830 1000 USD, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Tunisia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Madagascar and Tunisia rank globally for npk fertilizers — import value?
- Madagascar ranks 89th and Tunisia ranks 91st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf