Maldives vs Saint Lucia: NPK fertilizers — Import value
NPK fertilizers — Import value over time
- Maldives
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 391.2 1000 USD against 372.87 1000 USD in Saint Lucia, a difference of 18.33 1000 USD.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
Maldives ranks 152nd and Saint Lucia ranks 153rd of 187 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.51 1000 USD | 456.57 1000 USD | 436.06 1000 USD | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 32.52 1000 USD | 575.11 1000 USD | 542.59 1000 USD | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 278.46 1000 USD | 372.87 1000 USD | 94.41 1000 USD | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import value, Maldives or Saint Lucia?
- Maldives, at 391.2 1000 USD against 372.87 1000 USD in Saint Lucia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import value between Maldives and Saint Lucia?
- 18.33 1000 USD, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Saint Lucia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
- How do Maldives and Saint Lucia rank globally for npk fertilizers — import value?
- Maldives ranks 152nd and Saint Lucia ranks 153rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf