Montenegro vs New Caledonia: NPK fertilizers — Import value
NPK fertilizers — Import value over time
- Montenegro
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 2,723 1000 USD against 1,994 1000 USD in New Caledonia, a difference of 729 1000 USD.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.4 times New Caledonia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 140th and New Caledonia ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,741 1000 USD | 1,280 1000 USD | 461.37 1000 USD | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 1,802 1000 USD | 1,522 1000 USD | 279.79 1000 USD | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import value, Montenegro or New Caledonia?
- Montenegro, at 2,723 1000 USD against 1,994 1000 USD in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import value between Montenegro and New Caledonia?
- 729 1000 USD, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and New Caledonia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2015.
- How do Montenegro and New Caledonia rank globally for npk fertilizers — import value?
- Montenegro ranks 140th and New Caledonia ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf