New Caledonia vs Singapore: NPK fertilizers — Import value
NPK fertilizers — Import value over time
- New Caledonia
- Singapore
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 1,994 1000 USD against 1,743 1000 USD in Singapore, a difference of 251 1000 USD.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Singapore ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 142nd and Singapore ranks 143rd of 201 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,106 1000 USD | 1,982 1000 USD | 875.77 1000 USD | Singapore |
| 2010s | 1,522 1000 USD | 1,883 1000 USD | 360.66 1000 USD | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import value, New Caledonia or Singapore?
- New Caledonia, at 1,994 1000 USD against 1,743 1000 USD in Singapore as of 2015.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import value between New Caledonia and Singapore?
- 251 1000 USD, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Singapore?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2015.
- How do New Caledonia and Singapore rank globally for npk fertilizers — import value?
- New Caledonia ranks 142nd and Singapore ranks 143rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf