Romania vs Viet Nam: NPK fertilizers — Import value
NPK fertilizers — Import value over time
- Romania
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 156,553 1000 USD against 134,784 1000 USD in Romania, a difference of 21,769 1000 USD.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.2 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Romania ranks 13th and Viet Nam ranks 10th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17,637 1000 USD | 62,118 1000 USD | 44,480 1000 USD | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 53,453 1000 USD | 135,964 1000 USD | 82,511 1000 USD | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 189,785 1000 USD | 138,595 1000 USD | 51,190 1000 USD | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import value, Romania or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 156,553 1000 USD against 134,784 1000 USD in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import value between Romania and Viet Nam?
- 21,769 1000 USD, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Viet Nam?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Romania and Viet Nam rank globally for npk fertilizers — import value?
- Romania ranks 13th and Viet Nam ranks 10th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf