South Sudan vs Timor-Leste: NPK fertilizers — Import value
NPK fertilizers — Import value over time
- South Sudan
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 33.46 1000 USD against 29.46 1000 USD in Timor-Leste, a difference of 4 1000 USD.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Timor-Leste's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
South Sudan ranks 185th and Timor-Leste ranks 187th of 201 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 66.78 1000 USD | 17.56 1000 USD | 49.22 1000 USD | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 52.57 1000 USD | 19.61 1000 USD | 32.96 1000 USD | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher npk fertilizers — import value, South Sudan or Timor-Leste?
- South Sudan, at 33.46 1000 USD against 29.46 1000 USD in Timor-Leste as of 2024.
- What is the difference in npk fertilizers — import value between South Sudan and Timor-Leste?
- 4 1000 USD, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Timor-Leste?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do South Sudan and Timor-Leste rank globally for npk fertilizers — import value?
- South Sudan ranks 185th and Timor-Leste ranks 187th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as NPK fertilizers — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf