Armenia vs Barbados: People not using improved drinking water sources
Armenia
2,035 people
in 2024
Barbados
1,604 people
in 2024
Armenia rank
143rd
Barbados rank
146th
People not using improved drinking water sources over time
- Armenia
- Barbados
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 2,035 people against 1,604 people in Barbados, a difference of 431 people.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.3 times Barbados's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 143rd and Barbados ranks 146th of 231 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Barbados | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54,323 people | 3,879 people | 50,444 people | Armenia |
| 2010s | 24,830 people | 2,708 people | 22,121 people | Armenia |
| 2020s | 7,649 people | 1,764 people | 5,885 people | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using improved drinking water sources, Armenia or Barbados?
- Armenia, at 2,035 people against 1,604 people in Barbados as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using improved drinking water sources between Armenia and Barbados?
- 431 people, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Barbados?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Barbados rank globally for people not using improved drinking water sources?
- Armenia ranks 143rd and Barbados ranks 146th of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.