Armenia vs Lithuania: People not using improved drinking water sources
Armenia
2,035 people
in 2024
Lithuania
2,339 people
in 2024
Armenia rank
143rd
Lithuania rank
142nd
People not using improved drinking water sources over time
- Armenia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 2,339 people against 2,035 people in Armenia, a difference of 304 people.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 143rd and Lithuania ranks 142nd of 231 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54,323 people | 278,379 people | 224,056 people | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 24,830 people | 106,105 people | 81,275 people | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 7,649 people | 13,755 people | 6,105 people | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using improved drinking water sources, Armenia or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 2,339 people against 2,035 people in Armenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using improved drinking water sources between Armenia and Lithuania?
- 304 people, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Lithuania?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Lithuania rank globally for people not using improved drinking water sources?
- Armenia ranks 143rd and Lithuania ranks 142nd of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.