Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Caledonia: People not using improved drinking water sources

Bosnia and Herzegovina
1,530 people
in 2024
New Caledonia
1,350 people
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
147th
New Caledonia rank
149th

People not using improved drinking water sources over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • New Caledonia
020.0k40.0k60.0k200020122024

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 1,530 people against 1,350 people in New Caledonia, a difference of 180 people.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 147th and New Caledonia ranks 149th of 231 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina New Caledonia Difference Ahead
2000s 43,265 people 10,180 people 33,085 people Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 8,784 people 5,443 people 3,341 people Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 1,531 people 1,460 people 70.28 people Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher people not using improved drinking water sources, Bosnia and Herzegovina or New Caledonia?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 1,530 people against 1,350 people in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in people not using improved drinking water sources between Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia?
180 people, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia rank globally for people not using improved drinking water sources?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 147th and New Caledonia ranks 149th of 231 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Caledonia: People not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/number-without-improved-water/bosnia-and-herzegovina/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/number-without-improved-water/bosnia-and-herzegovina/new-caledonia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Caledonia: People not using improved drinking water sources</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
People not using improved drinking water sources
Unit
people
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
231 places, 5,586 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Number of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.