Chile vs Eswatini: People not using improved drinking water sources
Chile
180,633 people
in 2024
Eswatini
168,104 people
in 2024
Chile rank
86th
Eswatini rank
88th
People not using improved drinking water sources over time
- Chile
- Eswatini
How they compare
Chile currently reports 180,633 people against 168,104 people in Eswatini, a difference of 12,529 people.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 86th and Eswatini ranks 88th of 231 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 490,947 people | 397,390 people | 93,558 people | Chile |
| 2010s | 342,104 people | 284,338 people | 57,766 people | Chile |
| 2020s | 218,501 people | 193,625 people | 24,875 people | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using improved drinking water sources, Chile or Eswatini?
- Chile, at 180,633 people against 168,104 people in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using improved drinking water sources between Chile and Eswatini?
- 12,529 people, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Eswatini?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Eswatini rank globally for people not using improved drinking water sources?
- Chile ranks 86th and Eswatini ranks 88th of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.